1.) Comparative Advantage..... Who's more efficient at making each item?
absolute advantage = how much an individual can produce without taking into account economic context.
efficient - whomever sacrifices less when they produce something; fewer tradeoffs
- Rochester grads.... 10 bottles of wine/yr and 5 cameras/yr
- Cornell grads...... 3 bottles of wine/yr and 4 cameras/yr
Rochester Cornell
camera cost 5 cams cost 10 w 4 cams cost 3 wines
1 cam cost 2 w C = 3/4 wine
C = 2 wines
wine cost 10 w cost 5 cam 3 wines cost 4 cam
C = 1/2 cam C = 4/3 cam
- UR more efficient at making wine... have a comparative advantage in making wine over Cornell
- Cornell more efficient at making cameras.... comparative advantage in making cameras over UR
- UR has an absolute advantage in making both
- NOBODY CAN HAVE A COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE IN EVERYTHING!!!
2.) This is what happens when UR and CU grads TRADE:
UR CU
Initial 10 wine 0 wine
0 cams 4 cams
Then UR give CU 3 wines and CU give UR 3 cams (Price of Exchange = 1 wine per camera)
Final 7 W 3 W
3 C 1 C
Both parties experience economic growth because they're production plot lies on the outside of the curve. Going back to (1), for the two schools to be able to trade, 3/4 wine < P cam < 2 wines AND 1/2 cam < P wine < 4/3 cam. Since the price of exchange is 1 wine per camera, this falls within the ranges of both, so both experience economic growth.
3.) The main point of today's lecture was that self-sufficiency is the road to poverty. People should be social and trade rather than take everything into their own hands.
- Trade = a non-technical form of production that is much more efficient than self-sufficient production. Trade creates substantially more economic growth than self-sufficiency and so it is the more desirable route for most people. For this reason, countries that impose tariffs and exchange constraints on their citizens are costing the economy a lot.
No comments:
Post a Comment